Episode Transcript
[00:00:00] Speaker A: Foreign.
[00:00:22] Speaker B: Hello everyone, and welcome back to the final girl on 6th Avenue podcast. My name is. Hi. Is Carolyn Smith hilmer and I'm 6th Avenue's very own Final Girl.
And today you are actually listening to my real self again. I hope you all enjoyed the last episode that I published about Ex Machina using a pretty cool technology, you know, product that I found out about where you can clone your voice.
And I don't know it was relevant, especially considering the context of the film. So I don't know, pretty cool, kind of scary.
It's a little scary to me how similar it is the cloned voice is to my actual voice.
But, you know, that's why they say technology is cool and scary.
But this week, right, we have a holiday next week. Things are kind of shutting down or up here anyway, in New York, people get ready for vacation and some people have, you know, next week, work from home and next week off.
So today let's keep it light and let's just do something that I put together where, you know, people often ask me like, okay, you watch a lot of horror. You usually watch a specific type of horror, but what else do you watch? Well, I don't just watch a specific type of horror. I watch a lot of different types of horror. There's just only certain types of horror films that I'm going to discuss on this podcast to differentiate myself and my content.
But because people do often ask me what else do I watch, I thought maybe it'd be fun to talk about something still disturbing but something that's a little bit more real.
So I've put together a list of the 10 most disturbing documentaries I've seen.
And this will be like a bite sized episode. This is not going to be like a regular length episode, but just to give you guys some insight or some color into the other types of things that I watch other than the horror movies that we specifically talk about on this show.
And these are in no particular order, but they're just the top 10 that I found to be the most disturbing and that similarly, it seems like a lot of other people found to be disturbing.
So yeah, I thought that would be a fun way to kick off our, you know, pre fourth of July holiday. And if you're traveling, you know, this year for the holiday, please stay safe, be careful. If you're planning to shoot off fireworks, please be especially careful and hope and pray that if something bad does happen, that your home insurance policy does not specifically exclude fireworks.
Yeah. Bet you guys didn't know that that was a thing.
So with all that being said, let's get started again. These are in no particular order, but the first documentary that I'd like to talk about is called Voyeur. Voyeur came out in 2017, and it was directed by Miles Cain and Josh Corey. IMDb, our Bible. That's what we're going to use to talk about each of these and the descriptions of them.
Journalism icon Gay Talese reports on Gerald Foos, the owner of a Colorado motel who allegedly secretly watched his guests, with the aid of a specially designed ceiling vent, peering down from an observation platform that he built inside of the motel's attic.
Yeah, sound a little scary. It does to me, too.
And, you know, it's one of those things where, like, you have to sit and wonder. Like, you hear that and you're like, okay, well, what exactly was he watching?
Obviously he built this, you know, attic platform in the motel to watch couples have sex. Right? Like, that's what he was doing. But he claimed that it was for the purpose of social research, like observing people just in how they interact with each other while they're in private, seeing what people do when they're alone, et cetera. None of that makes this, you know, better in literally any capacity. But, like, voyeurism is something that, you know, there is a large number of people that, you know, have as a kink or even a fetish and that some people really enjoy and some people enjoy participating in.
This documentary was scary to me because hotels for me are always like a place where I'm, like, not sure if I'm 100% comfortable, just because it's a unfamiliar place for me, it's a new place. And it's one of those things where there's, like, you know, staff that work there, obviously, that have keys to all the rooms. And so this guy just circumvented, you know, my fear altogether and just like, was like, I'm just going to watch people in the attic. So, you know, there's that.
But this whole, you know, documentary was kind of under controversy for a few reasons, but one of them obviously being that we don't know the validity of, you know, Gerald's stories, and we don't know that what he claims that he witnessed was really true or really took place.
But the main concern here is that Gay Talese and Gerald Foos were, like, previously involved in a way together.
And then through their association, Gay Talise kind of had his reputation tarnished throughout this. This journey that they embarked on together.
And so this one, I would really Watch if you're looking for something that's like, not like, terrifyingly horrific, you know, like something you could sit through, that's interesting, but it's still disturbing.
And I don't want to give away too much when I talk about these. Right. So we're just gonna keep it brief.
The second documentary I want to talk about is called who Took Johnny? Who Took Johnny? Came out in 2014, and it is an examination into the cold case of the Iowa boy, Johnny Gosh, who disappeared on his paper route 30 years earlier and is directed by David Bellinson, Michael Galinsky and Suki Hawley. This one was really troubling for me.
You know, we kind of learn what it meant to be someone on the milk carton. And really it's how it's a deeper exploration using Johnny Gosh's case as an example of how missing child cases were handled like 30, 40 years ago.
And, you know, it's. There's a. It's a dark world out there. Children are not safe, people are not safe. And it's just interesting, disturbing, disgusting how this was handled and, you know, the. The facts surrounding the case.
And what's even more hard to watch is, you know, Johnny's mom throughout this documentary, and she's, I mean, literally an unending effort to find her son. And she claims in this documentary, and again, Johnny's not ever been found that we know of.
And he was a paperboy. It was written off as a, you know, a runaway case.
And his mom, you know, in her years and years and years of desperation of trying to find her son, claims in this documentary that she actually met her son at her own front door in the 90s when he was 27.
And so I don't. We don't know if that's true because again, we don't know where Johnny is. But, you know, this is a deep, deep, psychology rooted, sociology rooted documentary that will probably piss you off, but is still important to watch.
The third documentary I'd like to tell you about is called Capturing the Friedmans. And this came out in 2003.
A documentary on the. A seemingly typical upper middle class Jewish family whose world is instantly transformed when the father and his youngest son are arrested and charged with shocking and horrible crimes.
This is directed by Andrew Jarecki.
It won the Grand Jury Prize at Sundance and is absolutely horrific in every sense of the word.
It is just.
I've seen it twice, and there's really nothing that can prepare you for what you're gonna witness when you watch this. It's you know.
[00:10:01] Speaker A: They.
[00:10:04] Speaker B: They'Re, they're pedophiles, right? Like the dad was a pedophile. And it's, you know, an exploration of their family and how you watch families implode. You know, like they, they just, everything is fine and then all of a sudden nothing is fine. And you know, the, the son, the eldest son that they reference, David, you know, is kind of assembling footage and photos and that's kind of how like a lot of the stuff in the documentary came to be. And it is just, it's heartbreaking. And anything that involves pedophilia is obviously heartbreaking. And even, you know, the family members will say things throughout it they don't even know how.
Like their dad was even married to their mom.
Like, you know, we always talk about in life like, you know, it's funny, we always as kids are like, well, our parents never had sex. They only had sex whenever they were trying to have a kid. And then that the result of that sexual act is me, the child.
And, and they say in this documentary that like they really feel like that was true for their family because he was just, their dad was just not really around much and wasn't like painting a picture of what it meant to be like, you know, super in love with your spouse. And you know, the dad, Arnold, he had been collecting like child pornography magazines and he taught, you know, computer literacy. And like the police searched his house because they're, they're trying to find these child pornography magazines. And then, you know, you come to find out that he had a list of students that he taught this computer literacy to. And then they're alleging that, that all these sexual acts were, were forced upon them. So it's, it's really hard, this one is really, really hard to watch. But again, I think it's important that we learn about these types of situations. We learn about these types of people and you know, I'm not saying that you should watch this with any lens of support of these people, but whether we like it or not, these stories are important to tell.
Moving on to our next one.
We have abducted in Plain Sight. This came out in 2017. I've probably seen this way more times than you should watch documentary and it is just like the most insane thing you've ever heard of in your whole life.
The twisting turning stranger than fiction. True story of the Brobergs. A naive, churchgoing, Idaho family that fell under the spell of a sociopathic neighbor with designs on their 12 year old daughter.
This was directed by Sky Borgman this one is really hard to watch because you just sit back and you're like, what the fuck were these parents thinking?
Okay, they have this neighbor and this neighbor is obsessed with their 12 year old daughter. And under their own roof, right? They were letting this man sleep in the bedroom with their 12 year old daughter and would let him take her out to go do things. And then all of a sudden one day, you know, he kidnaps her obviously. But he had also sexually infiltrated the family as well by having sexual relations with the father and having sexual relations with the mother. And he had become so intertwined with this family, had beyond earned their trust that they really suspected that he could never have done anything like this with their 12 year old daughter.
Naive is the nicest way to describe these parents. I mean, just outrageous. I've never watched this and not been angry, like visibly angry. So you'll have to, you know, take a little, a little time for yourself after you watch this. And you know what, this might be one that you have to watch a couple times too just to see if it's really real because it's really that hard to believe.
If you want to get sufficiently pissed off. That's a good one.
[00:14:56] Speaker A: And here's another good one for you. This one is called Tell them you.
[00:15:01] Speaker B: Love me, Tell them youm Love Me came out in 2023. It was directed by Nick August Perna.
[00:15:09] Speaker A: A professor has a relationship with a.
[00:15:11] Speaker B: Non verbal man who has cerebral palsy.
[00:15:15] Speaker A: Their affair leads to a criminal trial.
[00:15:17] Speaker B: Over disability and consent. The film shows interviews and footage that present both perspectives.
[00:15:25] Speaker A: This one is pretty hard and the reason why it's so difficult is because you know, you have this woman and she's a professor and she's working with a disabled person whose name is Derek. And he has the cognitive level of someone between the age ages of 6 months to 1 year old.
And she was utilizing, you know, or practicing or claimed to be practicing what is called facilitated communication.
And the way that it was shown or done in this documentary is that basically you know, you have this man or this person and he's disabled and he is not able to communicate with the outside world using his voice. And so they were doing facilitated communication by way of her taking his hands and like putting her hands on top of them and like typing and.
[00:16:39] Speaker B: You know, basically asking him questions about things to see, you know, what he would say or how he would answer. And throughout this time that they spent together, she, you know, eventually he was her prey.
And this talks a lot about what is Facilitated communication. Is this even something that's real?
[00:17:05] Speaker A: And.
[00:17:07] Speaker B: What does it mean to have.
[00:17:10] Speaker A: A disability and also have consent over sexual acts or things of that nature?
[00:17:18] Speaker B: I don't want to get too deep.
[00:17:20] Speaker A: Into this, but it is extraordinarily sad and highlights the victimization and how people that are disabled and, you know, cognitively.
[00:17:38] Speaker B: Impaired in this way, face abuse and face.
[00:17:43] Speaker A: You know, things that we don't always think about. I guess she, you know, this woman, even they had.
[00:17:55] Speaker B: She claimed that they had a sexual.
[00:17:56] Speaker A: Relationship together and that he had told.
[00:18:01] Speaker B: Her that he loved her.
[00:18:03] Speaker A: And so.
[00:18:04] Speaker B: But again, because of, you know, facilitated.
[00:18:07] Speaker A: Communication, not being like a strong scientific.
[00:18:10] Speaker B: Person, practice, we really don't know that.
[00:18:13] Speaker A: He actually said that or he actually meant that or thought that. And it's very disturbing.
This woman is.
This woman should not be allowed to roam the earth, in my opinion, but that's me.
[00:18:29] Speaker B: Speaking of people who maybe shouldn't be.
[00:18:31] Speaker A: Roaming the earth, let's Talk about Kaneba 2017 documentary from the same directors of Leviathan. If you're familiar, this is Lucien Castang Taylor and Verena Paravel. And this is a little different from the types of, you know, films that these directors would typically release, in my opinion, because this is more of a documentary, whereas their other films are technically considered ethnography.
Those are slightly different, but there is nuance there.
This film reflects on discomforting significance of a cannibalistic desire in human existence through the prism of one man, Issa Sawaga, and his mysterious relationship with his brother, Jun.
Yeah, this man is a cannibal.
Mm, yep. You heard that right. He's a cannibal. He murdered a Dutch student in Paris and ate part of her body.
[00:19:47] Speaker B: He was living in France at the.
[00:19:51] Speaker A: Time, and he did not face a trial.
He was declared mentally ill, and after spending some time in a clinic in France for his mental illness, he went back to Japan and he wrote a.
A comic book about this crime and has even, you know, appeared in pornography.
And it's just, you know, something that I don't understand.
I can't say for certain that he is mentally ill or is not mentally ill. I think he is, but not in the way that you would consider someone mentally ill. Perhaps. Normally.
[00:20:53] Speaker B: They.
[00:20:53] Speaker A: They attempt throughout this to try to, like, get to the motivation behind the cannibalism.
I'm not certain that I got a clear answer, and I'm not certain that you're gonna get a clear answer, and it's very troubling.
And, you know, the way that he talks about his crime is almost like he's still romanticizing it. And he tries to, like, reason it by saying, like, well, you can't eat a person who's alive, so, like, you have to kill them first, obviously. Right.
It's one of those things where you think you really have seen it all.
[00:21:41] Speaker B: But you just haven't.
You just haven't.
[00:21:50] Speaker A: Moving on, let's talk about Paradise Lost. The child murders at Robin Hood Hills.
[00:21:57] Speaker B: This came out in 1996.
[00:21:59] Speaker A: This one's long. It's two hours and 30 minutes. There's also two supplemental pieces to this.
[00:22:07] Speaker B: So this is the first one.
[00:22:08] Speaker A: There's two more after that.
A horrific triple child murder leads to an indictment and trial of three non conformist boys based on questionable evidence.
[00:22:20] Speaker B: This was directed by Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky.
[00:22:25] Speaker A: And this one is one that really will divide a household. Okay.
I firmly am in the camp that I don't think that these three boys committed these murders.
I just don't. I don't think it's fair that they were, you know, essentially pinpointed by law enforcement because they were different than the rest of them in their community.
[00:23:00] Speaker B: You.
[00:23:00] Speaker A: Know, the rest of the people in their community.
And it's almost like, you know, it takes place in Arkansas, right? So it's kind of like, I don't know, thinking about Arkansas at the time and what, you know, I, I know of having grown up in the south. Like, I can see how these three boys would have made a good.
[00:23:23] Speaker B: I.
[00:23:24] Speaker A: Don'T know, a good, like, scapegoat for this, but I just don't think, think that they were the ones that did it. And the, the evidence is extraordinarily questionable, especially the way that it's presented.
And it's like you feel bad for these people, you feel horrible for the people who, you know, whose children were murdered. And you feel really bad for these three boys who are just really victims of social injustice and political injustice.
There's just, there's so many layers to this. And it's not, you know, it's, it's also very stereotypical and how people are viewed who are considered non conformist or who are not like your standard. Right? Like, you know, the one boy is.
[00:24:24] Speaker B: Is being interrogated about, like the type.
[00:24:26] Speaker A: Of music that he listens to. And like, there's just so much here that's so wrong feeling about this crime. And obviously it's a horrible crime. But I hate the idea that instead of finding the, the people who did this or the person who did this, they Just law enforcement was just like.
[00:24:48] Speaker B: Oh, well, they got three sue boys.
[00:24:50] Speaker A: And you know, they were, they're suspicious.
[00:24:51] Speaker B: So like, let's just do that.
[00:24:54] Speaker A: Like, how lazy do you have to.
[00:24:55] Speaker B: Be at your fucking job.
[00:25:01] Speaker A: Anyhow? It's an older one. Like I said, it came out in 1996.
[00:25:04] Speaker B: But I really do think that this.
[00:25:09] Speaker A: Is a really eye opening documentary. And it was for me as well, especially given that I didn't know that even still at the time that this, you know, came out, that witchcraft was still such a concern for so many people. Like they try to pin it on these boys. Like they committed these murders for witchcraft or some sort of like satanic ritual of some kind or something. And clearly these people know nothing about Satanism or what it means to practice Satanism. But, like, that's neither here nor there.
So again, let me know what you think.
Speaking of killing, right, we're going to talk about the act of Killing. The act of Killing came out in 2012.
It is a documentary which challenges former Indonesian death squad leaders to reenact their mass killings in whichever cinematic genres they wish, including classic Hollywood crime scenarios and lavish musical numbers.
[00:26:15] Speaker B: You know, this, these people were part, you know, and were responsible for.
[00:26:23] Speaker A: A genocide, right, of. Of a million people or more.
[00:26:27] Speaker B: And they just.
[00:26:31] Speaker A: They'Re just.
[00:26:34] Speaker B: Horrible.
[00:26:35] Speaker A: They're just horrible. And this was all, you know, during a time in Indonesia where.
[00:26:47] Speaker B: Pol Pot.
[00:26:48] Speaker A: Came to power and was essentially like, anybody who's smart, anybody who can, you know, read, anybody who has glasses or anybody who looks intelligent or anybody who you think might be too smart for this, let's just kill them because they wanted to.
He ultimately wanted complete and utter control.
And what's even, you know, what's funny or not funny, ironic, I guess, is that, you know, the people that are featured in this film, in this documentary are responsible for the assistance of committing all of these murders and all of these crimes. And it's one of the worst acts of genocide and mass killings in history.
And what's really interesting though is when you're watching it and they are reenacting or, yeah, they're reenacting it, you know, they're, they're mass killings and they're doing such in like whatever cinematic genre they want to, they will often stop and be like, oh, well, I can't do that again. Like, I got blindfolded and I can't do that again.
Well, what the fuck do you think you did to the people that you actually killed?
Or they will, you know, watch back whatever film that they wanted to create.
[00:28:18] Speaker B: And they'll say like, oh, well, I.
[00:28:19] Speaker A: Didn'T expect it to look this brutal.
Well, dude, you were fucking there the first time. What do you mean you didn't expect it to look brutal?
[00:28:27] Speaker B: Like you.
[00:28:28] Speaker A: It was worse when you did it in real life.
You know, they're still, these people are still in Indonesia and they're walking amongst us and they are just not.
[00:28:46] Speaker B: They'Re not.
[00:28:49] Speaker A: Empathetic at all. They have no remorse at all.
They even talk about, like, when you kill people, you should wear thick pants. You know, you should wear jeans. I always went killing in jeans. Like, they thought they were movie stars. They thought they were important. They thought they were just like the coolest, most badass people in the whole entire world. And when they're presented with reenactments of what they've done, they, like, can't stomach it. It really is extraordinarily difficult to watch and I, I would totally understand if, you know, none of you want to watch it. I really, really do.
But I do think it's important. It's one thing that, you know, we didn't experience it, you know, firsthand perhaps, but we understand what.
[00:29:46] Speaker B: This type of.
[00:29:47] Speaker A: You know, mass killing entailed.
And it's just, it's just, you know, one of those things that's, like.
[00:30:06] Speaker B: It'S.
[00:30:06] Speaker A: Important to remember that this happened.
It's hard to watch these people essentially be. Not reformed in any capacity and to still feel like what they did was justified.
And I think that you can learn more about the human psyche and from, you know, this, this period of world history than you can in any other, literally any other type of documentary about this. This is the most eye opening documentary I've ever seen in my life.
Okay.
Yeah, that one's hard. It's really hard.
So let's move on to another Sundance selected film we're going to talk about. Tickled. Tickled came out in 2016. And while, you know, basically all of these documentaries I've talked about so far have been unrated, this one has an explicit rating of R.
This was directed by David Ferrier and Dylan Reeve. Journalist David Farrier stumbles upon a mysterious tickling competition online. As he delves deeper, he comes up against fierce resistance. But that doesn't stop him from getting to the bottom of a story. Stranger than fiction.
I watched this in college with my roommates. God bless. They. I really put them through a lot. I really did. They, they were really good friends to me. They still are good friends to me. They're great people. I'm sorry that I made them watch all of the things that I made them watch. But what we're uncovering here, right, is like, there's this online activity. It's seemingly innocuous, right? You're, you're tangling up people with tickling and like, it's supposed to be strange at first, and then, you know, it's somehow a competition, so there's that aspect. And then the, the journalist tries to get in contact with the group who organized this and then they are met with nothing but like, abuse and vitriol. And like, they're just trying to figure out what happened, but they're getting bul. Bullied by the organization.
And like, the whole thing is just bizarre. But like, essentially there's a fetish incentive behind this whole thing. And this is just your first, if you're like me, this is your first foray into what it means to be part of competitive tickling and that, you know, the people that were participating in these videos or were participating in these quote unquote competitions, they are.
[00:33:16] Speaker B: They'Re like.
[00:33:16] Speaker A: Too afraid to speak out about.
[00:33:21] Speaker B: About.
[00:33:21] Speaker A: These, about these things they were featured in. And like, it's a type of exploitation and they, they, you know, not use their real names, but the organization tries to blackmail these people by putting out their real names. And, and then the whole thing is just so bizarre and it's really sad and it's a really, you know, bizarre and insightful look into how things can seem at first glance to be perhaps, I don't know, something fun or something light hearted or just kind of weird. But, you know, if something feels off, it's probably off.
And this has ruined the lives of so many people.
[00:34:17] Speaker B: And this is, you know, definitely one.
[00:34:20] Speaker A: That I would not watch if I was in a weird headspace. I would definitely wait to watch this until I was ready to devote my full attention and not be like, I would need to be okay. I would need to be in the.
[00:34:36] Speaker B: Headspace to be okay with.
[00:34:41] Speaker A: Being very upset by this whole thing. And it's really, you know, a marvel of journalism.
Speaking of contests, let's move on to our next one. This is called the Contestant. This also came out in 2023 and was directed by Claire Tettily, a Japanese reality TV star left naked in a room for more than a year, tasked with filling out magazine sweepstakes to earn food and clothing.
So essentially, you know, they took this man and they put him in a room and left him with magazines.
And there's nothing in the room, just him he has no clothes.
And this was televised, like every day. Like, these people were watching this every single day.
And he was deprived of food and clothes. He was deprived of pretty much everything.
And he would fill out these, like little sweepstakes submissions in magazines and, you.
[00:35:52] Speaker B: Know, would do so in order to.
[00:35:55] Speaker A: Try to win things like food and clothes.
Well, you know, clothes, I guess, are not really something that I would consider to be my top priority if I was in this situation. And so I would certainly prioritize the.
[00:36:08] Speaker B: Food so that I could stay alive.
[00:36:11] Speaker A: And what's really sad about this is like, he was in this room for more than a year and whenever he would fill out these, you know, sweepstakes submissions, if he would win, they would send him things like dog food, and.
[00:36:27] Speaker B: He would eat the dog food.
[00:36:29] Speaker A: And people in Japan, you know, people watching this were like, oh, my God, this is the funniest thing I've ever seen. There's nothing funny about this at all.
And the strength that this man had to endure this because guess what, he did it once and then another TV show essentially kidnapped him and had him do it again.
So he's done it twice.
[00:37:02] Speaker B: The way that he was able to.
[00:37:03] Speaker A: Turn his life around is astonishing to me.
[00:37:07] Speaker B: He obviously had a lot of issues with.
[00:37:12] Speaker A: Like, d derealization where like, he didn't know what was real anymore or what wasn't real anymore.
Whenever it would come time for like the show to end, he would have to question, like, is it really the end? Like, can I actually leave the room?
The way that these people broke this man is just heartbreaking. It's frankly, it's disgusting.
But we do learn more about him. And he even went on, okay, there is a happy ending to this one. He went on to assist and aid people that are climbing Mount Everest.
So, you know, not everything is horrible in this one. It does seem to have a.
Some blips of light heartedness throughout. But it.
[00:38:02] Speaker B: This, it's just.
[00:38:04] Speaker A: I can't. I cannot imagine being someone who like turns this on every day and is.
[00:38:10] Speaker B: Like, I'm gonna watch this dude die or I'm gonna watch this dude fight for food or eat dog food or eat whatever, you know, like, it did just.
[00:38:25] Speaker A: I can't imagine myself doing that.
[00:38:27] Speaker B: I'll watch that stuff if it's fake.
[00:38:30] Speaker A: I'm not gonna watch something real. And everybody thought it was funny. And it's not funny.
[00:38:37] Speaker B: It's heartbreaking.
[00:38:41] Speaker A: Our final documentary that we're gonna talk about today is called Finders Keepers.
Finders Keepers is maybe the Most bizarre one that we're gonna talk about today.
And let me tell you why.
Finders Keepers came out in 2015. And it also has an R rating.
Very explicit. This is a story about fame, addiction, and a custody battle over a man's leg.
This is directed by Clay Tweel and Brian Carberry. And this is just the most insane thing I've ever heard of.
[00:39:23] Speaker B: Okay, so.
[00:39:27] Speaker A: Like, there's a dude and he.
[00:39:33] Speaker B: He loses his leg. Okay, he loses his leg in an accident, and.
[00:39:40] Speaker A: Another man in an auction in North Carolina accidentally buys the leg.
[00:39:51] Speaker B: Because.
[00:39:53] Speaker A: It was in, like, a grill and that's where it was being stored.
And so then he, you know, he has this leg.
And the man whose leg it was, the man whose body it was originally attached to, thinks that that's his property because it was attached to his body.
But then the guy who bought it in the auction believes that it's his rightful property.
And I could never imagine being this, you know, invested in keeping someone else's body part.
But this one is so insane. I don't really want to give you more details like it. It is like a small town, you know, feud that later becomes a national media. And it is funny because it's so.
[00:40:58] Speaker B: Outrageous, but it's also tragic.
[00:41:01] Speaker A: And there's just a lot here that's.
It's so bizarre.
[00:41:08] Speaker B: It really is.
[00:41:09] Speaker A: I really.
This one, again, I would not watch just because I would watch it if you're in the right mindset for it. But genuinely, we're fighting over a man's leg. It was also in the official Sundance selection.
And, you know, I don't know where Sundance gets off thinking that they can just do all this stuff.
And it's insane. It's just insane. And, you know, it's literally just people fighting over somebody's leg.
So that is our episode for today.
I hope you enjoyed it. I hope that if I give or in the past, if I have provided recommendations that you are likely to want to explore them.
I obviously would not co sign on them if I didn't think that they were worth watching. So I do hope that you take some time to maybe explore a few of these.
And, you know, sometimes it's harder to watch things like this because they are real life, and it's easier to watch things that are fiction, even if it means the thing that is fictitious is more graphic in nature. But I do think that you learn so much about the world through watching documentaries, and it is important to also understand the evil that exists in our world and how you know, maybe not to fall victim to it or to learn how the minds of these predators and people work and think about social injustice and political injustice and all the things race, disability, gender, everything plays a role, right? And so again, I hope that some of you will take the time to to maybe watch a few of these, assuming you're in the right headspace to do so. So with all of that being said, you can find this podcast on Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music. If you enjoyed the show, it would mean the world to me if you left me a five star review and subscribe, subscribe to the show wherever you get your podcasts.
If you have any questions, comments, concerns, suggestions or requests, you can email me at finalgirl on6gmail.com or send me a message on Instagram at Final Girl on six. Please don't forget that this podcast is part of the Morbidly Beautiful network. Morbidly Beautiful is your home for horror. So please go to morbidly beautiful.com to check it all out. Show us some love. Listen to my podcasts and many other podcasts like it.
There are many like it, but this one is mine.
So thank you all for listening. I hope you all have a wonderful holiday. If you are celebrating the fourth of July. If you are not, I hope you have a great start to your July month. And I will be back very soon to talk to you about another film. And hopefully I won't get any emails from you all saying that you hate me for recommending these documentaries.
Thank you so much for listening. Never Forget that I'm 6th Avenue's very own final Girl and I will talk to you very soon.
